2.
On the other hand, safeguarding arrangements in
21% of schools were only satisfactory overall, indicating the need for
considerable improvement. Arrangements were inadequate – unacceptable in other
words – in 2% of schools (including 5% of pupil referral units). Weaknesses in
safeguarding are usually related to broader failings in leadership, management
and governance. In the small number of schools where safeguarding was judged to
be inadequate, common weaknesses included:
the failure to maintain a single central record
of recruitment and vetting checks covering all adults who had regular contact
with children
insufficient
child protection training
key
risk assessments not completed
a
failure by the governing body to monitor and review the policies to protect
children.
3.
The media has in recent years reported that
Ofsted is judging schools to be inadequate (‘failing’) solely on the basis of
weaknesses in their safeguarding arrangements. This is very rarely the case.
Indeed, in 2009/10, of over 6,000 schools inspected, only 26 were judged to be inadequate
for issues related solely to safeguarding. In these cases, breaches will have been
serious; inspectors turn to safeguarding early in a visit, allowing simple
errors to be corrected before they leave.
No comments:
Post a Comment